<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rocks-2-Digits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits</link>
	<description>A Computer-Oriented Blog for GeoScientists, by Mike Cline</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by mikec</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Thanks for the info about the stand-alone option for LogM.  They don't seem to advertise that fact--their website only mentions that it's been integrated into SeisVision, but no mention of anything else (at least that I could see).

Glad to hear that the blog has been worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info about the stand-alone option for LogM.  They don&#8217;t seem to advertise that fact&#8211;their website only mentions that it&#8217;s been integrated into SeisVision, but no mention of anything else (at least that I could see).</p>
<p>Glad to hear that the blog has been worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by Scott</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Mike,
my apoligies if I double post here, but I think i goofed...

Either way, in order to satisfy my curiosity, I had to make a call and find out about the LogM thing.  Turns out, LogM is available both standalone, and integrated (the integration is a bonus if you have both packages).

As for the Landmark bit, I see where you are coming from.  The PC-based community would have little or no use for the Linux products.

Last, thanks for doing all this blogging.  I have learned a lot from reading your blog.  It is a fantastic resource.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
my apoligies if I double post here, but I think i goofed&#8230;</p>
<p>Either way, in order to satisfy my curiosity, I had to make a call and find out about the LogM thing.  Turns out, LogM is available both standalone, and integrated (the integration is a bonus if you have both packages).</p>
<p>As for the Landmark bit, I see where you are coming from.  The PC-based community would have little or no use for the Linux products.</p>
<p>Last, thanks for doing all this blogging.  I have learned a lot from reading your blog.  It is a fantastic resource.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by Scott</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

That was fast.  Thanks for the reply...  I actually had to pick up my phone and make a call to satisfy my curiosity, but I did verify that LogM is available stand-alone.  If you have both SeisVision and LogM, you get the benefit of integration.  

I understand perfectly why you would have left off the Landmark one.  Now that I am seeing the target audience of your blog, the Linux world does not fit.

Also, I am really enjoying your blog.  I have learned much since discovering it.

Have a nice one,
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>That was fast.  Thanks for the reply&#8230;  I actually had to pick up my phone and make a call to satisfy my curiosity, but I did verify that LogM is available stand-alone.  If you have both SeisVision and LogM, you get the benefit of integration.  </p>
<p>I understand perfectly why you would have left off the Landmark one.  Now that I am seeing the target audience of your blog, the Linux world does not fit.</p>
<p>Also, I am really enjoying your blog.  I have learned much since discovering it.</p>
<p>Have a nice one,<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by mikec</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I didn't forget about Landmark's Syntool and GeoGraphix' LogM synthetic software.

Originally, this blog was directed more towards SMT's Kingdom 2d/3dPak users (but, many of the postings are generally applicable for users of the other interpretation software).  As such, I only mentioned SMT's SynPak module, and other stand-alone software, for those users who didn't have SynPak.

I left off the high-end, unix-based software like Landmark (and Geoquest), and the PC-based GeoGraphix on purpose, thinking that a user couldn't just license their synthetic modules, nor could they justify the cost for the entire interpretation packages, just to get the synthetic module, if they already had SMT's 2d/3dPak.  Not to mention that SMT's software is Windows-based, so a user would probably need a Unix operating system to run the Landmark software.

Also, the LogM synthetic software has been integrated into the SeisVision interpretation package, so again, a user would need to license the entire package, just for synthetics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t forget about Landmark&#8217;s Syntool and GeoGraphix&#8217; LogM synthetic software.</p>
<p>Originally, this blog was directed more towards SMT&#8217;s Kingdom 2d/3dPak users (but, many of the postings are generally applicable for users of the other interpretation software).  As such, I only mentioned SMT&#8217;s SynPak module, and other stand-alone software, for those users who didn&#8217;t have SynPak.</p>
<p>I left off the high-end, unix-based software like Landmark (and Geoquest), and the PC-based GeoGraphix on purpose, thinking that a user couldn&#8217;t just license their synthetic modules, nor could they justify the cost for the entire interpretation packages, just to get the synthetic module, if they already had SMT&#8217;s 2d/3dPak.  Not to mention that SMT&#8217;s software is Windows-based, so a user would probably need a Unix operating system to run the Landmark software.</p>
<p>Also, the LogM synthetic software has been integrated into the SeisVision interpretation package, so again, a user would need to license the entire package, just for synthetics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by Scott</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Arent you missing two of the largest SW companies, Landmark and GeoGraphix, from your list?  

LogM from GeoGraphix http://www.geographix.com/ps/viewpg.aspx?navigation_id=1271 and SynTool(?) from Landmark.  I am not all that good with Landmark stuff, but LogM, I have seen at the EAGE and the SEG in demos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arent you missing two of the largest SW companies, Landmark and GeoGraphix, from your list?  </p>
<p>LogM from GeoGraphix <a href="http://www.geographix.com/ps/viewpg.aspx?navigation_id=1271" rel="nofollow">http://www.geographix.com/ps/viewpg.aspx?navigation_id=1271</a> and SynTool(?) from Landmark.  I am not all that good with Landmark stuff, but LogM, I have seen at the EAGE and the SEG in demos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Ranks 11th in World Oil &#038; Gas Reserves by mikec</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/07/us-ranks-11th-in-world-oil-gas-reserves/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/07/us-ranks-11th-in-world-oil-gas-reserves/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Dan,

Oil and gas reserves can increase by several methods, such as:

1) When previously unknown reservoirs are discovered, such as is happening now in the very deep waters of the world's oceans (eg. Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, and South America).

2) Previously uneconomic reserves become economic (current income is higher than current production costs), due to increased prices (eg. Canada's oil sands, and US oil shales).

3) When hydrocarbons are converted from one form to another, by additional processing (eg. heating coal, to produce oil, or gas).

Good question, though.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>Oil and gas reserves can increase by several methods, such as:</p>
<p>1) When previously unknown reservoirs are discovered, such as is happening now in the very deep waters of the world&#8217;s oceans (eg. Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, and South America).</p>
<p>2) Previously uneconomic reserves become economic (current income is higher than current production costs), due to increased prices (eg. Canada&#8217;s oil sands, and US oil shales).</p>
<p>3) When hydrocarbons are converted from one form to another, by additional processing (eg. heating coal, to produce oil, or gas).</p>
<p>Good question, though.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Ranks 11th in World Oil &#038; Gas Reserves by Dan</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/07/us-ranks-11th-in-world-oil-gas-reserves/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/07/us-ranks-11th-in-world-oil-gas-reserves/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Hoe do the reserves of oiol go up when 1) we use oil, and 2) it is a non-renewable resource?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoe do the reserves of oiol go up when 1) we use oil, and 2) it is a non-renewable resource?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by mikec</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the helpful info Scott.

Mike C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the helpful info Scott.</p>
<p>Mike C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by Scott</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>The jTIPS product is relatively new (about 2 years) and was developed by Dr. Fred Hilterman.  It is one of the fastest and most intuitive applications I have ever used.  Dr. Hilterman provides it to his students for his courses but it is sold by PetroSeismic Software (www.petroseismic.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jTIPS product is relatively new (about 2 years) and was developed by Dr. Fred Hilterman.  It is one of the fastest and most intuitive applications I have ever used.  Dr. Hilterman provides it to his students for his courses but it is sold by PetroSeismic Software (www.petroseismic.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Programs to Generate Your Own Synthetics by Michael</title>
		<link>http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txresources.com/rocks2digits/2008/02/25/synthetic-seismogram-programs/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Hello!
Also you can add Syntetics from Schlumbergger software - Geoframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
Also you can add Syntetics from Schlumbergger software - Geoframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
